Privacy Principles Applies After Death

by

 

Privacy Principles Applies After Death

Are your staff looking at medical records when they shouldn’t be?

Many people have the mistaken impression they can look at a patient’s medical records as long as they don’t tell anyone else.

It’s not okay.

We continue to see examples of snooping where both seasoned and new healthcare providers and support staff don’t realize that looking at patient’s health information—even with good intentions—is a serious privacy violation.

As privacy lawyer Kate Dewhirst puts it

  • Privacy = Don’t look
  • Confidentiality = Don’t tell

Despite years of experience, many healthcare professionals still need a refresher on the basics. Privacy awareness training remains essential.

In this article, I am sharing an example of the Ontario’s Information Privacy Commissioner (IPC). This case involves a privacy complaint submitted by the family of a deceased individual. It’s a good reminder that whether you’re running a brand-new clinic or managing an established practice, it’s critical to understand your legal responsibilities and have systems in place to protect patient information.

What Happened

In 2014, a physician accessed a deceased patient’s health records while acting in his role as a coroner. The patient was also a family member. Soon after, the family alleged that the physician continued to access the individual’s personal health information (PHI) contrary to Ontario’s Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA).

The family submitted a complaint to the hospital. Initially, the hospital’s response did not satisfy the family. The family filed a complaint to the Information and Privacy Commissioner (IPC) of Ontario.

The IPC started a complaint investigation.

privacy principles after death privacy breach incident scenario diagram

Privacy Complaint Investigation

Under PHIPA, the hospital is a health information custodian and the physician is an agent of the hospital.

During the IPC investigation, the physician admitted he “accessed the health information in response to his concern about the individual’s well-being.”

“I know now that proceeding in this way was misguided and wrong.” He would never disclose the information to anyone; that would be a violation of patient privacy and a breach of doctor – patient confidentiality.

He acknowledged he misunderstood the difference between:

• Privacy: The general right of every individual (living or deceased) to limit access to their health information.
• Confidentiality: The duty to not share that information once accessed.
• Circle of care / Need to know: You must only access information required to provide care at that moment.

4 Step Response Plan

When you have a privacy breach, follow these four steps to manage the privacy breach incident.

Step 1 – Spot and Stop the Breach

The family’s complaint prompted the hospital to begin the first step to spot and stop the breach.

Step 2 – Evaluate the Risks

An initial risk assessment was conducted, and after the IPC got involved, the hospital re-opened the investigation. They completed a comprehensive review and used audit log reporting tools to trace access.

Step 3 – Notify

The hospital eventually informed the family of the privacy breach—but the notification wasn’t timely. A more thorough and timely response could have helped address the family’s concerns more effectively.

Step 4 – Prevent the Breach From Happening Again

Following the breach, the hospital implemented several improvements:

  • Introduced a new auditing program that enhances its ability to detect unauthorized access.
  • Updated its Privacy and Confidentiality Policy, which applies to all agents of the hospital.
  • Launched mandatory annual electronic privacy training program for all staff, volunteers and learners. Physicians must complete this training as part of the annual reappointment process.
  • Strengthened the privacy warning on its electronic system, which warns users that unauthorized use of personal health information may result in disciplinary action.

privacy principles after death sanctions

The hospital’s Medical Advisory Committee also recommended disciplinary actions:

  • A three-month suspension of the physician’s hospital privileges
  • Three years of enhanced monitoring of his access to patient records
  • A requirement to present at Grand Rounds on privacy topics upon his return

The IPC concluded that the disciplinary consequences for the physician were sufficient in the circumstances.

Privacy Breach Nuggets You Need to Know

Privacy breaches are in the news every day. Here’s how you can be proactive to prevent privacy breach pain.

  • Go beyond policies—model good practices
  • Use real-life examples in staff meetings
  • Incorporate gamification and ongoing discussions to engage your team

Privacy awareness is everyone’s responsibility. Make sure your staff know what’s expected, what’s at risk, and what to do if something goes wrong.

If you need to start or update your privacy awareness training program, check out the on-line education Privacy Awareness in Healthcare: Essentials.

When we know better, we can do better…

I’ve helped hundreds of healthcare practices prevent privacy breach pain like this. If you would like to discuss how I can help your practice, just send me an email. I am here to help you protect your practice.

PRIVACY BREACH NUGGETS are provided to help you add a ‘nugget’ to your privacy education program. Share these with your staff and patients as a newsletter, poster, or staff meeting.

Jean L. Eaton, Your Practical Privacy Coach

References and Resources

Dewhirst, Kate. After Death: Who Can Access The Records Of A Patient After Death? May 7, 2019. https://katedewhirst.com/blog/2019/05/07/after-death-who-can-access-the-records-of-a-patient-after-death/

Ontario Information and Privacy Commissioner IPC Investigation Report PHIPA DECISION 74 HC15-4 Sault Area Hospital August 10, 2018.